There are any number of Fiberals in India (Sagarika Ghose, Kavita Krishnan, Rana Ayyub, Barkha Dutt etc) whose love and concern for the good treatment of terrorists often overflows. We have also known many to file appeals for mercy or for clemency. I therefore thought reproducing this letter would help bring these Fiberals a great deal of relief in their aim to provide proper care of “misguided elements” who carry out acts of terrorism:
A Canadian female libertarian wrote a lot of letters to the Canadian government, complaining about the treatment of captive insurgents (terrorists) being held in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities. She demanded a response to her letter correspondence. She received back the following reply:
National Defense Headquarters
M Gen George R. Pearkes Bldg., 15 NT
101 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa , ON K1A 0K2
Dear Concerned Citizen,
Thank you for your recent letter expressing your profound concern of treatment of the Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists captured by Canadian Forces who were subsequently transferred to the Afghanistan Government and are currently being held by Afghan officials in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities. Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinions were heard loud and clear here in Ottawa. You will be pleased to learn, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself; we are creating a new department here at the Department of National Defense, to be called ‘Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers‘ program, or L.A.R.K. for short.
In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to divert one terrorist and place him in your personal care. Your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence in Toronto next Monday.
Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint! It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant caretakers. We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommend in your letter. Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his ‘attitudinal problem’ will help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences.
We understand that you plan to offer counseling and home schooling.’ Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group. Please advise any Jewish friends, neighbors or relatives as your house guest might get agitated or even violent, but we are sure you can reason with him. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him.
Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except sexually) since he views females as a sub human form of property thereby having no rights, including refusal of his sexual demands. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will “recommend” as more appropriate attire. I’m sure you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka over time. Just remember that it is all part of ‘respecting his culture and religious beliefs’ as described in your letter.
Thanks again for your concern. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job and care for our fellow man. You take good care of Ahmed and remember we’ll be watching.
Good luck and God bless you.
Minister of National Defense
PS: This letter is a hoax and not real but it provides enough food for thought for the Fiberals should they wish to take on such responsibilities.
NEW DELHI: A daughter-in-law has no right to continue to occupy the self-acquired property of her parents-in-law against their wishes, the Delhi high court has held in a significant order.
Justice A K Pathak in a recent verdict, made it clear that a self-acquired property doesn’t fall under the definition of a “shared household” enunciated in the Domestic Violence Act and a daughter in law can’t enforce her right in such a property.
In fact, HC went a step further, holding that even an adult son or daughter has no legal right to occupy the self-acquired property of the parents against their consent.
“Daughter-in-law cannot assert her rights, if any, in the property of her parents-in-law wherein her husband has no right, title or interest. She cannot continue to live in such a house of her parents-in-law against their consent and wishes. In my view, even an adult son or daughter has no legal right to occupy the self-acquired property of the parents; against their consent and wishes. A son or daughter if permitted to live in the house occupies the same as a gratuitous licensee and if such licence is revoked, he has to vacate the said property,” the court noted in its order.
HC was hearing an appeal by the daughter-in-law against a trial court’s verdict directing her to hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the property to her estranged father-in-law. In her plea in HC the woman said she is a legally wedded wife and has a right to live in the property from where her father-in-law wants her evicted.
She claimed that the property was purchased out of joint family funds. Accusing the father-in-law and husband of harassing her for dowry, she informed HC that she is living separately from her husband due to matrimonial discord and divorce proceedings are on. Under DV Act, the property is a shared household where she has the right to reside, the wife maintained.
But the father in law through advocate Prabhjit Jauhar told HC that he is sole owner of the self-acquired property. Jauhar also convinced the court that the property was not purchased from joint family funds and his son had no share in it.
The father-in-law furnished before the court proof that he disowned his son in 2010 who has since then been living separately.
Justice Pathak concluded that the legal position “which can be culled out from the above reports is that the daughter-in-law has no right to continue to occupy the self -acquired property of her parents-in-law against their wishes more so when her husband has no independent right therein nor is living there, as it is not a “shared household” within the meaning of Section 17(1) of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.”
HC also took into account lack of evidence to show that suit property was purchased from joint family funds.
This is what today’s abla nari is doing and indian politicians are still living in stone age assuming that women are being victimised and passing draconian laws like 498A, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT and PROPERTY DISTRIBUTION ACT recently. Crooked educated women will misuse the law passed recently where a lady can claim 50% of the property of her husband just after getting married formally even if she NEVER had any intention of staying in the marriage.
NOW this bill will encourage men to ask for HUGE sums of money and PROPERTY to secure their and their family’s property and assets.
This will increase in the demand of DOWRY by to be married boys and their families.
I am not against empowering women but while empowering women we have to be careful that nobody else is victimised ( because of these laws it will be innocent women who will be victimised and not empowered ) .
Smooth swindler in police net
Rajwinder, posing as an NRI, would dupe men after marriage Anirudh Gupta
Ferozepur, May 29 After having duped five grooms and fleeced several youths on the pretext of taking them abroad, Rajwinder Kaur, pretending to be a Canadian citizen, has been finally arrested along with her brother Hardial Singh and accomplice Jagsir Singh.
Jewellery, cash and three duplicate passports were seized from the trio. Rajwinder and her brother belonged to Gandiwind village under the Harike police station .
Paramraj Singh, DIG, Ferozepur Range, said despite several cases of fraud against Rajwinder in Batala, Mansa, Kotkapura and Samana, she had remained elusive till now.
Rajwinder would entice rich farmers, promising them that she would take them abroad after marriage. She would later dump the innocent victims after having swindled them of their money, the DIG said.
He said till date, five such cases had come to light. Rajwinder’s latest victim was Kulwinder Singh of Kotwal village, said HS Mann, SSP. He said after marriage, Rajwinder began to tempt her husband’s kin who were keen on settling abroad. “A smooth operator, she did not let anyone in the family get an inkling about her intentions,” the SSP said, adding that she swindled Rs 5 crore in this manner. She took some of them and deserted them there.
Swindler’s list of crimes
Link Here :
B01 – The Book
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUjUCeu9u8g Part 1 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI2PlZhHj4g Part 2 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hiNmKl94j4 Part 3 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnCUJibycLU Part 4 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u3AHJZY-9I Part 5 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-01jhXJmeNY Part 6 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs_aHHExCzc Part 7 of 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyOTol2GOw0 Part 8 of 8
Court concerned over
misuse of dowry laws
New Delhi, October 8
Expressing concern over misuse of penal provisions for harassment to women for dowry and subjecting them to cruelty, a Delhi court has counselled women to get out of the sour marital relations rather than being revengeful.
The court’s concern and advice found a place in a ruling by Additional Sessions Judge Kamini Lau upholding the acquittal of a man and his three family members from the charges of harassing his wife. She expressed concern over the misuse of dowry laws citing a Supreme Court verdict which termed it as “legal terrorism.”
“I may observe that Section 498A (subjecting woman to cruelty) of the IPC in the recent years has become a consummate embodiment of gross human rights violation, extortion and corruption and even the apex court had acknowledged this abuse and termed it as legal terrorism,” ASJ Lau said.
The court counselled women to get out of discordant marital relations, quoting Sahir Ludhianvi.
“Taaruf rog ho jaaye to usko bhoolna behtar; Taalluk bojh ban jaaye to usko todna achcha; Wo afsaana jise anjaam tak laana na ho mumkin; Use ek khoobsoorat mod dekar chhodna achcha,” the court said.
The court gave the order upholding a magisterial court order which acquitted woman’s husband Sanjay Kumar, his father Vijay Kumar, mother Beena Devi and brother Ranjeet of the charges of subjecting his wife to cruelty for dowry. – PTI
Link Here :