It is no secret that today’s social problems can be traced to the disintegration of the family unit. Sociologists and politicians from both parties are speaking publicly about this. What is not discussed openly is that this phenomenon is the result of a planned conspiracy to usurp control over the.
It is the determined purpose of the New World Order to dominate and subdue the cultures of the world and shape them into one global culture. To do this it has been necessary to remove children from the environment of the traditional family where they would receive religious instruction and be trained to think independently.
In 1968, Warren Bennis and Philip Slater wrote in THE TEMPORARY SOCIETY, “One cannot permit submission to parental authority if one wishes to bring about profound social change….In order to effect rapid changes, any such centralized regime must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved. It is necessary, in other words, artificially to create an experiential chasm between parents and children to insulate the latter in order that they can more easily be indoctrinated with new ideas. The desire may be to cause an even more total submission to the state, but if one wishes to mold children in order to achieve some future goal, one must begin to view them as superior, inasmuch as they are closer to this future goal. One must also study their needs with care in order to achieve this difficult preparation for the future. One must teach them not to respect their tradition-bound elders, who are tied to the past and know only what is irrelevant.”
In 1969, the Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children presented a report to Congress, stating, “As the home and church decline in influence… schools must begin to provide adequately for the emotional and moral development of children…. The school…must assume a direct responsibility for the attitudes and values of child development. The , psychologist, social technician, and medical technician should all reach aggressively into the community, send workers out to children’s homes, recreational facilities and schools. They should assume full responsibility for all education, including pre-primary education.”
Even though many children live with their parents, they are being effectively raised by their school teachers and the television media. They are taught by both in subtle ways to disrespect parental authority and look upon the traditions of the past as backward.
Brock Chisholm (1959 Humanist of the Year) was at one time head of the World Health Organization, and in the February 1946 issue of PSYCHIATRY he wrote, “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition national patriotism, and religious dogmas….We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests….The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated objectives.. .for charting the changes in human behavior.”
Never in the history of the world has the experience of being a child been so fraught with danger and stress. If a child survives its formative years in day care.without being aborted, it could possibly face a fatherless childhood, living on welfare in an urban environment with drugs and violence. If the child is raised by both parents at home, both parents might be required to work out of economic necessity and the child would spend its early,
There is no question thatand abuse is epidemic. Stresses placed on society are often taken out on its most weak and vulnerable members. It seems that the only recourse for society to take is to pass laws protecting its children.
This created crisis has formed a vacuum in which government must naturally fill. Legislation has given broad powers to state social workers. If they so much as receive an anonymous tip about the possibility of child neglect or abuse, they may, accompanied by law enforcement, enter a home without a warrant (warrants are obtained as a result of sworn testimony from a witness). They may separate the children from the parents and ask them embarrassing, personal
questions. They may take them into if they feel they have just cause to do so.
Public hysteria over children’s issues has cleared the way for social workers to obtain police state powers in the name of “protecting children.” This ambiguous mission statement must necessarily include, “protecting children from their parents.” The state may intervene in a home where it feels the children are being harmed by the manner in which they are being raised, such as, or hard work.
All things are as the New World Order planners would have it. They have used the media to flood our culture with promiscuous sexual attitudes. Teaching of “safe sex” has given license to teen indulgence, creating a generation of unwanted children who must be raised by the state. Economic pressures have weakened the family unit, creating rebellion and division in the home. “Women’s rights” and “children’s rights” have worsened the lot of both. This is how
the planners would have it.
“In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.” Matt. 2:18.
Please refer :
http://www.apfn. org/thewinds/ 1996/08/family_ unit.html